Monday, March 10, 2025

Trump’s Democratic ‘Allies’ - Victor Davis Hanson

 

by Victor Davis Hanson

Democrats’ obsessive Trump hatred blinds them to their own unpopularity, making his counter-revolution seem inevitable—and even normal.

 

 

Former Clinton strategist James Carville has reinvented himself at age 80 as a sage Democrat podcaster. His predictions—remember, a victorious Kamala Harris?—are usually wrong. He enjoys engaging in public duels with celebrities to gain online clicks and media appearances.

Yet sometimes he appears judicious in his effort to return his party to the Clinton glory days of 1992-2000, before the takeover of the party by the lunatic left. That said, he too has become part of the new left nihilism he supposedly despises.

Most recently, Dr. Carville diagnosed Donald Trump as suffering from tertiary syphilis. Carville’s “proof” was his identification of a bruise on Trump’s much-used shaking hand, along with his supposed brain dementia. As confirmation, Carville described Trump as a “fat f—ing slob” with a “beached whale body.” So, a once top Democratic strategist has gone from his 1992 iconic campaign reminder, “It’s the economy, stupid,” to smearing Trump as a fat slob with syphilis. Carville’s descent sums up his entire party.

Meanwhile, the congressional Democratic opposition finds itself loudly and proudly standing with only 20-30 percent of the American people on matters from biological males competing in female sports to an open border. For years, Democrats claimed the lack of “comprehensive immigration reform” prevented them from securing the border and stopping a 10-12 million influx of illegal aliens. And then they went quiet when Trump, without any new legislation, simply enforced existing immigration statutes and nearly eliminated all illegal entries.

Defeated candidate Kamala Harris is still trying to reassure donors that she did not know how she blew millions of dollars in last-minute 2024 campaign gifts by paying off the likes of Oprah, Al Sharpton, and Cardi B for interviews and endorsements while flying young staffers around the country on rented private jets.

The Democratic Congress under Chuck Schumer and Hakim Jeffries demonstrates their opposition to Trump by cutting videos in which party luminaries promise to stop the “sh-t.” Fellow Democratic congresswomen rivaled them with a worse ad in which they dressed in macho kickboxing attire and clumsily gyrated as if they were punching out their conservative opponents.

At Trump’s first congressional address, most Democrats did not stand when a young survivor of a brain tumor was honored by receiving an honorary Secret Service membership. Instead, many of them displayed hand-held, bingo-like-placards attacking Elon Musk as a thief. Democratic Women’s Caucus members wore pink uniforms, while septuagenarian Rep. Al Green shook his cane, screaming like a lunatic at Trump at the dais. He had to be forcibly escorted out of the joint session of Congress, which otherwise was already frequently interrupted by Democratic heckling and jeering.

What is going on?

Like a drug user who knows his addiction is killing him but cannot quit, the Democratic Party privately understands that the majority of the American people do not buy into their transgender, open border/illegal alien, reckless spending, fanatical green advocacies, and diversity/equity/inclusion racial essentialism.

Yet, they continue their destructive fixations in fear of their own hardcore base. And who are these radicals that run the party?

Some are the students who hit the streets and disrupt campuses to protest for the terrorists of Hamas, or the edgier and even crazier who approve of violent acts, such as youth between 18-29 who poll in favor of Luigi Mangione’s recent assassination of a United Health executive.

And then there are the various racial caucuses who no longer make much attempt to hide their overt racial obsessions and separatism. There is also a growing overt anti-Semitism among many of the DEI crowd who seem to think their own minority status shields them from repercussions. The various public sector and teacher unions are babied. Both can rally money and protests, but otherwise cannot improve dismal schools or incompetent bureaucracies.

So, the current Democratic Party is completely unaware of the irony that to stop Trump, they must become far more unpopular than Trump. We are witnessing the most radical counter-revolution in the last 100 years, as the Trump administration attempts to slash government spending and the federal bureaucracies. It insists on reciprocal tariffs with friendly, neutral, and hostile nations alike. It will vastly expand energy production, end once and for all illegal immigration, fire the DEI industry and its overt racism, reboot public health policies, redirect the Pentagon, and, in general, reexamine almost every entrenched left-wing government institution and policy of the last 50 years.

Normally no party would even attempt such needed but radical changes in a country that in the last three elections split nearly 50/50. To conduct such a rare counterrevolution, a president by nature would have to become controversial and make enemies as he battled opposition in Congress, the courts, the media, and the street. And Trump does all that. Yet in less than 60 days, he has done more to reverse the radical left-wing agenda than even Ronald Reagan did in eight years. And so far, he is continuing on course.

How and why? Part of his audacity is found in the unique personage of Trump, who enjoys controversy. He is a private sector builder who hates delay and obfuscation. He sees his political modus operandi as no different than building a Manhattan high-rise, whose success is predicated on cutting deals, bulldozing obdurate opponents, and delivering a superior product that eventually the public appreciates despite the controversies surrounding its construction and implementation.

But part of Trump’s success is also the gift of the new Democrat Party. It is so foul-mouthed, so embarrassingly infantile and exhibitionist, and so out of touch with the wishes of the American people that at least for now it makes Trump’s counter-revolution seem normal and long overdue—especially after the four-year catastrophe of the nihilist Biden administration.

Rather than agree on anything with Trump, the Democrats will automatically oppose everything he does, even if that means pushing issues that 70 percent of the people don’t want, or play-acting like 1960s spoiled college protestors, or shielding violent illegal aliens, or mouthing now-tired Trump-is-Hitler-Mussolini-Stalin boilerplate.

In a sane world, the Democrat opposition would do two things.

One, for each of Trump’s initiatives that it opposes, it would publish a comprehensive counter agenda, hoping to side with the majority of the people. And when it rarely more or less agreed with Trump, or felt he was on the right side of public opinion, sane Democrats would then offer bipartisan support in hopes of helping the nation, as well as stealing Trump’s thunder by taking credit for popular reforms.

Instead, it is doing neither. Like a spoiled teenager who sticks out his tongue when his allowance is cut, the Democratic Party and its appendages in the media are now screaming profanities, now crying and whining in despair, and now coming up with all sorts of bizarre conspiracies that Musk is a felonious thief, that Trump is a syphilitic, and that the only way to get their way is to destroy all prior protocols of congressional civility.

Again, the irony is that by doing all that and more, they are gifting to Trump a despised alternative to almost everything he is doing. The more their polls fall, the more Democrats believe that they did not act quite juvenilely, obnoxiously, and foully enough.

In sum, if Trump succeeds with his historic counter-revolution, his new anti-New Deal, it will be due in no small part to those who hate him and thereby reveal themselves to be innately hateful.

And Democrats almost daily apparently want the American people to witness their venom—and thereby to be revolted by them.

 
Victor Davis Hanson

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/03/10/trumps-democratic-allies/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The man who called for action before Oct. 7 explains how to solve Gaza, Iran - interview - Yonah Jeremy Bob

 

by Yonah Jeremy Bob

The Jerusalem Post speaks to the new head of JISS, ex-IDF intel. analysis chief Yossi Kuperwasser.

 

Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser. (photo credit: JISS)
Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser.
(photo credit: JISS)

In July 2023, former IDF intelligence analysis chief Yossi Kuperwasser called to invade Gaza and said Hamas was being given far too much space to threaten Israel.

Nearly the entire defense establishment believed that Hamas was deterred, and many viewed Kuperwasser as an alarmist, a warmonger, or as detached from the far more limited practical security options under consideration.It turns out that Kuperwasser was one of the only officials who saw Gaza and Hamas clear through the fog, with all of the military probes essentially acknowledging that he was right (though they did not mention him by name). In recent weeks, he took over as head of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS).
Given that he got so many things right on issues that many other smart intelligence officers wildly missed, how would he assess the current challenges relating to Gaza and Iran?Regarding Gaza, he told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday that his starting point would be: “We want to get the hostages back without paying too large a price.
Enlrage image

“It is hard to deal with the challenges, but we can use our achievements and assets, given that we have weakened Hamas, to try to obtain the new reality we want,” he argued, saying that Israel has five new advantages.

Israel has five new advantages, he said.“We have many cards to play and they only have the hostages. Reality has changed. There were so many parties in the Middle East who tried to help Hamas to demand a large price and to stay in control of Gaza,” he said.

“Now, most parties are not actively standing up for Hamas. Not Iran, not Hezbollah, not Iraq, not the Palestinians in the West Bank, and not Israeli-Arabs,” he said.

Kuperwasser said that even if the Houthis were still threatening to fire rockets on Israel or to disrupt maritime trade, they are not a significant factor.

He also said the reality in the US changed dramatically.President Donald Trump “is supporting all Israeli efforts, and he is referring to Hamas in a hostile manner. He said decisively: Hamas cannot stay in Gaza.”

Kuperwasser further noted that the Trump plan would even mean all the Palestinians living in Gaza would leave to facilitate the enclave’s rebuilding.

He stated that there is “the card of humanitarian aid; Israel can use this. It will take time until it is effective, but it is a serious bargaining chip to use if we have patience. 

“There is the card about the future – there will be no reconstruction or funding of reconstruction unless we allow it.

He described how Israel “can use more military force. There is a new IDF chief who will use it more massively as compared to [former defense minister Yoav] Gallant and [former IDF chief Herzi] Halevi. They can carry out a wider military operation against Hamas and be ready to hit it in a harsher manner,” such as by invading all of Gaza at once, instead of the separate rounds of invasions spread out over six to 10 months, which Israel carried out this past year. 

Pressed that the remaining Hamas fighters could flee and hide within the 2.3 million Palestinians who would be evacuated to the al-Mawasi humanitarian zone on the coast in the case of a renewed full Gaza IDF invasion, Kuperwasser assured the IDF would overcome this. 

“During the war, we have also reached them [Hamas terrorists] in al-Mawasi, in schools, and in UN facilities, where they had been hiding. We attacked many of the schools they were hiding in. Hopefully, we will have strong intelligence to get Hamas fighters and will harm fewer innocent persons” in the vicinity, he said. 

He added, “There will be a significant impact on the Gaza area infrastructure,” something that always worries Hamas.

 Asked about how long such a new Gaza invasion would need to be and how long the IDF would need to remain in Gaza as opposed to past operations during the war in which the military invaded an area, achieved operational control, and then withdrew, he responded: “However long is needed.”

Attendance numbers in reservist duty

Questioned about estimates that attendance by reservists to call-ups had fallen from 150% at the start of the war to as low as 50% for some units now or in the event of a renewed invasion, he said, “I hope it will not be like this. Israeli society understands the situation and is realistic about the idea that you cannot leave Hamas in place in Gaza.”

If Israel did leave Hamas in power, “this would send us back to October 6. It would be a sort of a win for Hamas regarding October 7. They freed thousands of Palestinian security prisoners... and are rehabilitating to become even stronger across the Palestinian community – we cannot leave them in control” of Gaza, he said.

REGARDING HAMAS’S backer, Iran, Kuperwasser said, “We need to eliminate their pathway to developing a nuclear weapon, and not merely to prevent them from the final act of getting one. As long as they have the potential capability to develop one, it will be continuously hard to stop them. We need a reality where they cannot make one at all.

“Right now, they are very close to obtaining one. They have lots of 60% enriched uranium and a large amount of 20% enriched uranium, which is also very dangerous,” and an even larger volume of lower enriched uranium, he said.“This is a reality we cannot continue to live with.”

According to Kuperwasser, “If there is economic pressure, diplomatic isolation, and a viable military threat from the US, then talking with Iran could be great as it is always better to resolve things without using force.

But we need to be ready [for the possibility] that it may not work out. We see the tone of [Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei – he is against a deal despite the current pressure. Also, despite the Israeli attack on October 26 on Iran, he is not waiving a white flag.” 

Pressed about when Israel would need to attack if diplomacy does not succeed, on one hand, he said that Jerusalem would “not need to attack tomorrow,” but on the other hand, he thought that waiting until the October deadline, when the economic sanctions global snapback against Iran expires, would be waiting too long. 

“It is not clear if there will be talks. It is clear how much more dangerous Iran is now and that we need to act soon,” he said. 

Further, he noted that large aspects of Iran’s anti aircraft defense systems – and some aspects of Iran’s ballistic missile development – were harmed by the attack on October 26, and that Tehran is also weaker because it currently cannot “use Hezbollah to hit hard, the Assad regime fell, and economically Iran is weak."

So it is appropriate to ramp up all of the pressures. They must have no potential ability to make a nuclear weapon, and the inspections must be truly effective, not like under the JCPOA” 2015 Iran nuclear deal, according to Kuperwasser.

Regarding how long the IDF can remain in its Syria buffer zone, Kuperwasser said, “We cannot set a specific deadline, time must be determined by a set of factors. Not six months or one year. We follow developments. 

“There is a new security doctrine. We are trying to prevent the presence of dangerous terrorists on our borders. We are also doing this in Lebanon, though I am not sure for how long. We are trying to understand who Ahmed al-Sharaa is and where he is taking Syria,” he said.

He stated that, “Since 2014, he has been pragmatic compared to the more radical Islamists. He has emphasized Syrian nationalism over pan-Islamism…But he still came from al-Qaeda…We need to be suspicious. Turkey is also taking action. The situation in Syria is very unstable.”

“Look at the episodes in recent days. There are tensions with the Kurds in the North. The Druze are shuddering in fear about defending themselves,” he said, adding that Israel must help the Syrian Druze.

Regarding his new role at JISS, he stated, “We need to preserve this realist think tank and even grow it to be larger so it can impact the debates in Israel more significantly.

 “There is too much attention on the extreme views on both sides. We need to stick to real and serious issues and perspectives,” he stated.Further, he said, “The institute will grow to have a more significant impact both on the media, and also the decision-makers in Israel and around the world.”

Kuperwasser said that influencing global debates would be done both remotely and with additional travel.

Besides his top-level IDF post, Kuperwasser was previously the director-general of the Strategic Affairs Ministry, most recently served as a senior project manager at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs, and has had top positions in a variety of think tanks.


Yonah Jeremy Bob

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-845363

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The new FBI's battle against Iran's expanding terror network - opinion - Erfan Fard

 

by Erfan Fard

Kash Patel confronts formidable challenges that are directly tied to the strategies and tactics of the mullah’s regime in Iran.

 

March 5 2025 Dulles airfield as FBI personnel and our DOJ + CIA partners delivered a terrorist wanted for the Afghanistan Abbey Gate murders. (photo credit: FBI)
March 5 2025 Dulles airfield as FBI personnel and our DOJ + CIA partners delivered a terrorist wanted for the Afghanistan Abbey Gate murders.
(photo credit: FBI)

The new FBI in America faces a significant challenge that has intensified with the arrival of the new director, Kash Patel: the expansive terrorism network of the Islamic Republic’s regime. This concern stems not just from the overt terrorist activities, but also from the intricate and broad networks that the Islamic Republic has cultivated to further its international objectives.

Recently appointed as the director of one of the world's most pivotal security and intelligence agencies—the FBI—Patel confronts formidable challenges that are directly tied to the strategies and tactics of the mullah’s regime in Iran. The persistent and principal issue, which continues to inflict harm, is linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran and the mullah regime in Tehran. To effectively counter these imminent threats, the FBI must enhance its strategies and continuously innovate in its research methodologies and information gathering techniques.

First Point: The Islamic terrorism network clearly demonstrates how the Islamic Republic, using complex mechanisms and significant resources, manages and directs between 11 to 21 different terrorist groups and more than 11 dangerous cartels. Beyond the Middle East, in Africa, Europe, and Latin America, groups affiliated with the Islamic Republic undertake actions that leave profound regional and international impacts. These groups, often operating underground and using complex communication networks, carry out their destructive activities under the guise of civil or humanitarian actions.

For the new FBI, finding these organic connections between dangerous and destructive networks is a challenging task. This difficulty is not only due to the secrecy and encryption of information by these groups but also due to the lack of accurate and up-to-date information. Although the Counterterrorism Division of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security was well aware of the complexities of these networks from 2017 to 2021, their strategies have always faced challenges. Even after the assassination of Qasem Soleimani by the CIA during Donald Trump's first presidency, the FBI did not accurately predict the reactions of the Islamic Republic within U.S. territory, inadvertently contributing to an increase in threats. They acted arrogantly, unwilling to heed the opinions and analyses of other parts of the U.S. security and intelligence community, which in turn created blind spots in their assessments.

 The FBI logo is seen outside the headquarters building in Washington, D.C., July 5, 2016. (credit: Yuri Gripas/AFP/Getty Images)Enlrage image
The FBI logo is seen outside the headquarters building in Washington, D.C., July 5, 2016. (credit: Yuri Gripas/AFP/Getty Images)

Second Point: The sleeper terrorist cells of the Islamic Republic of Iran within U.S. soil represent a multidimensional and complex threat. These cells are controlled and managed by the Ministry of Intelligence, the Revolutionary Guards, and the Quds Force, each of which has a dedicated "America desk." The existence of these desks indicates a high level of focus and expertise in activities related to America, directing extensive and targeted operations on American soil.

Agents from all three organizations in North and South America are managed from within the embassies and consulates of the Islamic Republic, and specific missions are assigned to them. This tactic, involving the use of diplomatic covers for espionage and terrorist activities, creates significant challenges for the FBI, as arresting and dealing with these individuals without violating international laws is difficult.

Third Point: The propaganda machine network of the Islamic Republic is hidden under various umbrellas, including charitable organizations, religious institutions, Persian media affiliated with the U.S. government (most of whose experts and guests are despised individuals affiliated with the Islamic Republic), infamous lobbies supporting the Islamic Republic (which attempt to infiltrate the political corridors of Washington and English-language media in America), and the academic network and educational centers that strive to echo the propaganda machine of the Islamic Republic within America. These networks are active not only on Iranian soil, known as "Islamic Republic 1," but also extensively on American and European soils as "Islamic Republic 2."

During the Obama and Biden administrations, the FBI did not show any inclination to scrutinize religious institutions. Persian media outlets like VOA Persian and RFE/RL, which are affiliated with the U.S. government, have been largely ineffective and have not contributed positively to U.S. policy, only draining the budget. To date, the FBI has also not shown any willingness to shut down infamous pro-regime lobbies, such as NIAC and Quincy, which support the Islamic Republic from within American soil.

Furthermore, the FBI has not demonstrated any tendency to expel professors and experts who disseminate the destructive ideology of Khomeinism on American soil. This failure to tackle the influential networks of the Islamic Republic stems not only from a lack of political will but also from a deficiency in effective strategies to identify and counter these influences. Unless the FBI revises its policies, the secondary propaganda machinery of the Islamic Republic will continue to operate actively within the United States.

Fourth Point: The challenge of discovering agents affiliated with the Islamic Republic remains. The FBI lacks precise knowledge and correct guesses about the activities and operations of the Islamic Republic within American soil. However, FBI analysts are certainly aware that the mullah-led Islamic Republic, under various covers and signs, possesses a very complex and closed security and intelligence system that makes accessing reliable information difficult. This complex system includes intelligence networks that are actively operating worldwide and use various techniques to protect their information.

This intricate network contributes to the increase in cyber attacks against America. These threats can include cyber espionage or attacks on vital infrastructures. These attacks are designed not only for destruction or disruption but also as part of a long-term strategy to gather information and gain strategic superiority.

Indeed, alongside the CIA, the FBI also needs to upgrade its capabilities to counter cyber threats. This improvement must include strengthening technological capabilities, updating training courses for personnel, and developing new strategies to identify and counter new enemy tactics. Moreover, international collaborations to counter these threats must be strengthened, as the Islamic Republic does not operate only in one geographic region, and its effects are globally visible.

Some advice to the FBI

As a counterterrorism analyst, I stress the importance of recognizing challenges and security strategies. The FBI, as a domestic judicial entity in the United States, encounters significant legal constraints when conducting international operations. These constraints substantially affect the agency's ability to monitor and counteract threats from the criminal ayatollah’s regime in Iran. Moreover, the intricate political and security dynamics between the United States and Iran, often shaped by political tensions and sanctions, impact the FBI's operational effectiveness.

To counter threats from Iran effectively, the FBI must engage in close collaboration with other international intelligence and security agencies. This collaboration should encompass the exchange of information, coordination of joint operations, and leveraging shared experiences in combating terrorist networks. Such partnerships are crucial in bolstering capabilities to identify and prevent terrorist activities, thereby enhancing national security.

Additionally, the FBI must bolster its technological infrastructure and enhance its cyber capabilities to effectively counter the malign activities of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Given the escalation of cyber threats capable of damaging critical American infrastructure, this enhancement entails advanced training for personnel, the development of sophisticated technological tools, and the formulation of innovative methods to identify and neutralize threats.

Lastly, the challenges and obstacles the FBI encounters in combating the Islamic Republic of Iran demand continual vigilance and revision. This process should include persistent threat assessments, updates to strategies, and enhancements in international cooperation to ensure that the agency operates at its highest efficiency.

 
Erfan Fard

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-845436

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Do Not Be Fooled By Hamas's 'Long-Term Ceasefire' Ploy - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

It is plainly uninformed to believe that Hamas would ever lay down its weapons and agree to end its jihad (holy war) against Israel. A ceasefire deal will allow Hamas to remain in power and prepare more massacres against Israel.

 

  • As part of the deception, according to the IDF report, Hamas was working to convince Israel that it was interested in calm and was working for economic prosperity. The IDF investigation concluded that Hamas had planned the October 7 attack for more than 10 years.

  • Today, everyone knows that the talk about a long-term truce was nothing but a smokescreen to conceal Hamas's real intention of launching its October 7 attack against Israel.

  • Hamas anyway is not known for honoring ceasefire agreements.... On July 26, 2014, Hamas announced a 24-hour humanitarian ceasefire at 14.00. Hamas violated its own ceasefire a short time later.

  • For Hamas, a hudna is a temporary break from war -- it does not indicate a desire to end it and achieve peace. While Hamas was talking, for ten years before October 7, 2023, about its desire to reach a long-term truce, it was busy preparing for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.

  • It is plainly uninformed to believe that Hamas would ever lay down its weapons and agree to end its jihad (holy war) against Israel.

  • The Trump administration is advised to listen to what Hamas leaders say in Arabic to their own people, and not what they tell US officials during secret meetings in Qatar. Earlier this month, for instance, senior Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri, speaking in Arabic, reassured his people that his group rejects demands by Israel and the US to disarm...

  • A ceasefire deal will allow Hamas to remain in power and prepare more massacres against Israel. The only solution for the current crisis is for Hamas to disarm, cede control over the Gaza Strip and leave the Palestinian arena.

For Hamas, a hudna is a temporary break from war -- it does not indicate a desire to end it and achieve peace. While Hamas was talking, for ten years before October 7, 2023, about its desire to reach a long-term truce, it was busy preparing for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. It is plainly uninformed to believe that Hamas would ever lay down its weapons and agree to end its jihad (holy war) against Israel. A ceasefire deal will allow Hamas to remain in power and prepare more massacres against Israel. Pictured: Hamas terrorists in Gaza City on January 25, 2025. (Photo by Abood Abusalama/Middle East Images via AFP)

Adam Boehler, the US Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, stated on March 9 that he did not rule out the possibility of reaching a long-term truce between Israel and the Iran-backed Palestinian terrorist group Hamas in the Gaza Strip. He also did not rule out the possibility that Hamas would agree to lay down its weapons, saying:

"I think there's an answer here, and I think the answer is that Hamas lays down their arms. We exchange prisoners, and they [Hamas] go into a long-term truce, where they don't fight, they're not part of any political party, and that gives us lots of cooling-off time."

Boehler's statements came after the American media outlet Axios revealed that the Trump administration has been holding direct talks with Hamas over the release of US hostages held in the Gaza Strip and the possibility of a broader deal to end the war, which erupted on October 7, 2023 when thousands of Hamas terrorists and ordinary Palestinians invaded Israel, murdered some 1,200 Israelis and wounded thousands others. Another 251 people were kidnapped to the Gaza Strip. Fifty-nine hostages are still being held by Hamas, half of whom may no longer be alive.

While the Trump administration deserves enormous appreciation for its sincere efforts to secure the release of the Israeli and American hostages, it must be careful not to allow itself to be duped by Hamas.

For many years, Israel believed that Hamas was not interested in an all-out war with Israel and was working for economic prosperity in the Gaza Strip. Recently, when the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) published the results of an investigation into the October 7 massacre, they showed how Hamas managed to deceive Israel into thinking that the terrorist group was not interested in another round of fighting. As part of the deception, according to the IDF report, Hamas was working to convince Israel that it was interested in calm and was working for economic prosperity. The IDF investigation concluded that Hamas had planned the October 7 attack for more than 10 years.

Hamas's deception included sending messages to Israel indicating interest in a long-term truce. According to one report:

"Hamas recently sent a series of messages to Israel indicating interest in a long-term ceasefire lasting for several years... Senior Hamas officials met with Western diplomats about the ceasefire, and also reached a number of understandings about the character of the ceasefire, also known as tahdiyya [calm]."

In 2018, Egypt was reported to be finalizing details of a long-term truce deal between Israel and Hamas. An Egyptian security source was quoted as saying that "the period of calm will be for one year, during which contacts will be held to extend it for another four years."

Today, everyone knows that the talk about a long-term truce was nothing but a smokescreen to conceal Hamas's real intention of launching its October 7 attack against Israel.

Hamas anyway is not known for honoring ceasefire agreements. During the past 15 years, several truces reached between Hamas and Israel collapsed after the terrorist group violated them, including by test-firing rockets toward the sea, including those with a notably long range. On July 15, 2014, Israel accepted a ceasefire initiated by Egypt and stopped all fire. However, Hamas terrorists then fired more than 50 rockets at Israeli communities. On July 17, Israel agreed to a five-hour humanitarian ceasefire. Hamas rejected it and fired rockets, including at the city of Beersheba. On July 20, Israel approved a two-hour medical and humanitarian window in the area of Shejaiya in the Gaza Strip, following an International Committee of the Red Cross request. Forty minutes after the ceasefire went into effect, Hamas violated it. Nevertheless, Israel implemented the ceasefire, even extending it for two more hours. On July 26, 2014, Hamas announced a 24-hour humanitarian ceasefire at 14.00. Hamas violated its own ceasefire a short time later.

Some Westerners mistakenly think that Hamas's talk about a hudna (armistice or truce) implies that the terrorist group seeks peace with Israel. Yet, hudna has another meaning for many Muslims, particularly extremists. The roots of hudna can be traced back to the Treaty of Hudaybiyya in 628 CE, a pivotal agreement between prophet Mohammed and the Quraysh tribe of Mecca. This treaty allowed Muslims to perform pilgrimage to Mecca and established a truce between the two parties for 10 years. Over the following two years, however, Mohammed rearmed, broke the hudna and launched a full conquest of Mecca.

For Hamas, a hudna is a temporary break from war -- it does not indicate a desire to end it and achieve peace. While Hamas was talking, for ten years before October 7, 2023, about its desire to reach a long-term truce, it was busy preparing for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.

It is plainly uninformed to believe that Hamas would ever lay down its weapons and agree to end its jihad (holy war) against Israel.

The Trump administration is advised to listen to what Hamas leaders say in Arabic to their own people, and not what they tell US officials during secret meetings in Qatar. Earlier this month, for instance, senior Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri, speaking in Arabic, reassured his people that his group rejects demands by Israel and the US to disarm, emphasizing:

"The right to resistance is nonnegotiable. The weapons of the resistance are a red line, and we won't exchange it for reconstruction [of the Gaza Strip] and humanitarian aid."

The assumption that a long-term ceasefire would lead to "cooling-off time" is misguided. As in the past, Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist groups will exploit any period of calm to rearm, regroup and resupply.

In the past, Hamas leaders also met with Western officials, but that did not prevent them from pursuing their jihad against Israel. In the past, some Hamas officials also mentioned the possibility of reaching a long-term truce with Israel, but that feint did not stop the terrorist group from firing rockets toward Israeli towns and cities or preparing the October 7 massacre.

A ceasefire deal will allow Hamas to remain in power and prepare more massacres against Israel. The only solution for the current crisis is for Hamas to disarm, cede control over the Gaza Strip and leave the Palestinian arena.


Khaled Abu Toameh
is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21461/hamas-ceasefire-ploy

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

How Hamas got a Ramadan ceasefire and released no hostages - analysis - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

Hamas appears to be able to secure de facto ceasefires for Ramadan each year and not have to ever do anything in return.

 

Palestinian Hamas gather at the site of the handing over of the bodies of four Israeli hostages in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza on February 20, 2025. (photo credit: EYAD BABA/AFP via Getty Images)
Palestinian Hamas gather at the site of the handing over of the bodies of four Israeli hostages in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza on February 20, 2025.
(photo credit: EYAD BABA/AFP via Getty Images)

On March 1, the first phase of the hostage and ceasefire deal ended between Hamas and Israel. Usually when a ceasefire deal ends, the two sides should return to fighting. This is especially true if one side gets nothing in return. However, more than a week and a half later, Hamas is receiving a ceasefire and Israel has received no hostages in return. During the first phase of the ceasefire deal 33 hostages were released in 42 days. It used to be that around three hostages were freed every Saturday. No hostages were freed on March 8.

The question is how Hamas outmaneuvered Israel to get a ceasefire extended with nothing in return. A larger question is how it happened to coincide with Ramadan. It appears that Hamas was also able to outplay Israel last year during Ramadan 2024 which took place in March.

Palestinians arrive at the Omar Al Mukhtar bazaar on the ninth day of the holy month of Ramadan in Gaza City, Gaza on March 09, 2025. (credit: Dawoud Abo Alkas/Anadolu via Getty Images)Enlrage image
Palestinians arrive at the Omar Al Mukhtar bazaar on the ninth day of the holy month of Ramadan in Gaza City, Gaza on March 09, 2025. (credit: Dawoud Abo Alkas/Anadolu via Getty Images)

During that period Israel also reduced the intensity of operations in Gaza and Hamas was able to recuperate. Hamas appears to be able to secure de facto ceasefires for Ramadan each year and not have to ever do anything in return. This is in contrast to how Hamas treats Israel.

On Simchat Torah 2023, Hamas attacked Israel and murdered more than 1,000 people and took 250 hostages.

Today, Hamas is sitting in Gaza as if it won the war. It relaxes and its men walk around freely. Large number of terrorists have been released in January and February to secure the deal. There are no repercussions for Hamas. During the 2024 de facto Ramadan ceasefire, the IDF was still operating in parts of Gaza, such as the Netzarim Corridor and there were airstrikes. Today there are no airstrikes and no tanks in Netzarim. The only place the IDF continues to hold in Gaza is the Philadelphi Corridor along the Egyptian border.

Hamas says it wants phase two of the ceasefire deal. Israel has said it won’t enter into phase 2, under which the war ends, Israel leaves Rafah and Hamas releases all the hostages. Israel has been adamant that it won’t do this. Hamas called Israel’s bluff on March 1 and Israel didn’t decide to return to war. There may be some reasons for this. The IDF is in transition from the former chief of staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi to the new Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir who took on the reins of the military on March 5.

On the other hand there appears to have been a belief that Hamas would be flexible and agree to Israel’s terms. When Hamas didn’t agree after March 1 there was talk of what might happen next. Some reports claimed Israel would return to fighting in “days” or a week. However, Hamas again called this bluff and simply waited. Hamas thinks time is on its side. Another aspect of the ceasefire that continued were reports that Trump envoy Steve Witkoff would come and hammer out a deal as he did in mid-January during the lead-up to the first deal.

US involvement 

However, Witkoff has many things on his plate. Reports indicated that in the absence of phase 2, Witkoff favored a proposal where half the remaining hostages in Gaza would be released on the first day of a new deal, and half at the end of the deal, when the war would perhaps end, or at least Ramadan and Passover would be over. However, Hamas apparently felt it could negotiate for better. Thus, after a few days reports of another deal emerged. Maybe Hamas would release 10 living hostages for a 60-day ceasefire. Hamas played for time and didn’t seem to care for that deal either.

Now, reports indicate that Hamas has been in direct contact with the Trump administration. Adam Boehler, the US special presidential envoy for hostage affairs, did rounds of interviews on Sunday discussing the initiative to discuss a deal with Hamas. The US wants the hostages released, and Trump has met with the hostages. Trump wants something to happen. He is willing to do what it takes to get the hostages, including the American hostages, out of Gaza.

In some circles in Israel, there has been concern about the direct talks with Hamas. Israel doesn’t seem to be in a hurry to do a deal. The US appears to be in more of a hurry to get hostages out of Gaza. Hamas understands the interplay here and assumes it can sit for Ramadan and that nothing will happen.

Israel has said it has cut off aid to Gaza and also now cut off electricity. These decisions seem more performative than effective. Hamas has electricity in Gaza. Hamas has stockpiled aid from the first phase of the ceasefire. Therefore, Hamas continues to relax. Hamas reads the Israeli reports about Israel incrementally increasing pressure and Israel considering other operations in Gaza. Hamas can read, it thinks nothing is going to happen. It also seems to think it can play the US off against itself by stalling and carrying out various tracks of discussions via Doha and Cairo.

The overall story here is simple. It’s in Hamas’s interests to have a ceasefire and recuperate and rebuild itself. So long as Israel and the US are willing to talk endlessly with Hamas, just as happened throughout 2024 and resulted in no deal, Hamas and its allies in Doha and Cairo will continue to outplay Israel and the US. This is the story of how Hamas received a Ramadan ceasefire and so far has not had to do anything in return.


Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-845390

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump 'horrified' by return of Bibas children, Security Advisor Mike Waltz says - Hannah Sarisohn

 

by Hannah Sarisohn

Waltz said that Hamas's return of the Bibas children's bodies, without their mother Shiri, shows what despicable people Hamas are and why they can never be allowed to run Gaza.

 

US President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, US. February 5, 2025. (photo credit: reuters/kent nishimura)
US President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, US. February 5, 2025.
(photo credit: reuters/kent nishimura)

President Donald Trump is 'horrified' by the scenes coming out of Israel following the return of the Bibas children's bodies on Thursday, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz said Friday morning at the Conservative Political Action Conference. 

"His heart breaks," Waltz said of Trump. "My message, President Trump's message to those families, we are with you."

Waltz said that Hamas's return of the Bibas children's bodies, without their mother Shiri, shows what despicable people Hamas are and why they can never be allowed to run Gaza. 

"There is a lot of talk about two states. You know who doesn't want two states, who will never allow two states? Hamas," Waltz said. "And this is why they can never, they just cannot exist, going forward."

Waltz's relief that Netanyahu didn't listen to Biden

Waltz said "thank god" that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu didn't listen to the Biden-Harris administration, and as a result of Trump's leadership and Israel's leadership, Hezbollah in Iran is now decimated.

 Pictures of Shiri Bibas and her children Kfir and Ariel, in Jerusalem, February 20, 2025 (credit: FLASH90/CHAIM GOLDBERG)Enlrage image
Pictures of Shiri Bibas and her children Kfir and Ariel, in Jerusalem, February 20, 2025 (credit: FLASH90/CHAIM GOLDBERG)

"I mean, the beeper operation is going to go down in history," he added. "That was one of the greatest ones in history."

Waltz noted Trump's recent executive order returning to the maximum pressure campaign against Iran to start "keeping a foot on the neck of the Iranian economy."

The key to all of it is that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon, he said. 

"Why does that matter to everyday Americans? Look, if Iran has a nuke, there is a real question of whether they're a rational actor, and they can take out our ally Israel, they can launch against the world. They will have that nuclear umbrella to launch these, all of these other attacks," Waltz said. "They cannot have a nuclear weapon, and under President Trump's leadership, we will ensure that does not happen."


Hannah Sarisohn

Source: https://www.jpost.com/american-politics/article-843204

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Federal agents arrest former Columbia student, who led protests - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

"We will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported," U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated.

 

Credit: ICE/U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Credit: ICE/U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, coordinating with the U.S. State Department, arrested Mahmoud Khalil, who completed his graduate studies at Columbia University in December, “in support of President Trump’s executive orders prohibiting antisemitism,” the U.S. Department of Homeland Security stated on Sunday.

“Khalil led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization,” the department added. “ICE and the Department of State are committed to enforcing President Trump’s executive orders and to protecting U.S. national security.”

“We will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported,” wrote Marco Rubio, the U.S. secretary of state, in response to an Associated Press story about the arrest.

According to the ICE website, a Mahmoud Khalil, who is from Syria, is in the custody at Elizabeth Contract Detention Facility in New Jersey.

Several senators supported Rubio’s statement.

“Terrorist sympathizers have no place in our country,” stated Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.).

“Who else is glad this pro-Hamas agent of antisemitism has been detained?” wrote Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). “So many people want to immigrate to America,” he added. “We don’t need those who support genocidal war criminals.”

“President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are sending a clear message to terrorist sympathizers,” wrote Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.). “I’ve been calling for this in the Senate, and I’m thankful we have leadership in this new administration that is standing up for what is right.”

“Obtaining a U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,” stated Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.). “Friends of Hamas—don’t let the door hit you on the way out.”

Khalil’s lawyer said that he was arrested in Columbia housing at about 8:30 p.m. on Saturday night, the Columbia Spectator, a student paper, reported. “The agents said they were detaining him because the State Department had revoked his student visa, but Khalil is a green card holder and a lawful permanent resident,” his lawyer told the Spectator.

Columbia stated on Sunday that “there have been reports of ICE around campus.”

Columbia University protests
A view of protesters demonstrating outside the campus of Columbia University in New York City on April 25, 2024. Credit: Evan Schneider/U.N. Photo.

“Columbia has and will continue to follow the law. Consistent with our longstanding practice and the practice of cities and institutions throughout the country, law enforcement must have a judicial warrant to enter non-public university areas, including university buildings,” the university stated. “Columbia is committed to complying with all legal obligations and supporting our student body and campus community.”

The university also released a “further” statement on Sunday, in which it stated that “there have been reports of ICE in the streets around campus. Columbia has and will continue to follow the law. We want to again communicate to our campus community that we have a protocol in place, which includes phone numbers to call in case you are approached on or off campus.”

“Consistent with this protocol, and consistent with our longstanding practice and the practice of cities and institutions throughout the country, law enforcement must have a judicial warrant to enter non-public university areas, including residential university buildings,” it stated.

“Columbia is committed to complying with all legal obligations and supporting our student body and campus community,” it added. “We are also committed to the legal rights of our students and urge all members of the community to be respectful of those rights.”

Khalil’s lawyer told the Associated Press that ICE agents also sought to arrest Khalil’s wife, “an American citizen who is eight months pregnant,” per the news wire.

“The Trump admin is going after students, who have used their First Amendment, constitutional rights. This is unacceptable,” wrote Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who has a long history of criticizing Israel. “Deporting legal residents solely for expressing their political opinions is a violation of free speech rights. Who’s next? Citizens?”

“Finally! An anti-Jewish activist Mahmoud Khalil, who led the pro-Hamas mobs at both Columbia University and Barnard College, has been arrested by ICE agents at his campus apartment,” wrote Brooke Goldstein, executive director of the Lawfare Project.

“Khalil faces having his visa revoked and his green card canceled following President Trump’s long overdue crackdown on unrest at colleges,” Goldstein wrote. “Godspeed. Good riddance.”


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/federal-agents-arrest-revoke-visa-of-former-columbia-student-who-led-protests/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why Is Trump’s FTC Chairman Continuing Lina Khan’s Socialist Policies? - Robert H. Bork, Jr.

 

by Robert H. Bork, Jr.

Trump’s FTC chair Andrew Ferguson is enforcing Biden-era antitrust rules, abandoning the consumer welfare standard and embracing regulations that expand government control over the market.

 

 

Although I’ve never heard him use the precise term, President Trump’s every statement and action as a free-market advocate leads me to mark him down as an intuitive believer in the consumer welfare standard. This is the doctrine that courts should judge deals and business operations under antitrust laws not according to vague, ever-shifting standards but by their measurable impacts on price, quality, and innovation for the consumer.

After decades of inconsistent standards in judges’ rulings—ranging from protecting inefficient competitors to subjective judgments about how big or small businesses should be—the Supreme Court adopted the hard-and-fast metrics of the consumer welfare standard. They did so in 1979, one year after my father, Judge Robert Bork, gave this standard its fullest definition in his magnum opus, The Antitrust Paradox.

Antitrust enforcement that puts the protection of the American consumer at the heart of the law is consummately Trumpian. It is reflected in DOGE and the deregulatory push to return money to the people so they can vote with their dollars on what they want and need instead of letting elites in Washington choose for them. Surely President Trump agrees. After all, why else would he dispatch his Vice President J.D. Vance to warn the Europeans that their progressive antitrust policies persecute American businesses and harm Europe’s own economic growth?

With the election of Donald Trump, supporters of the consumer welfare standard were elated. For four years, Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and Department of Justice Antitrust Chief Jonathan Kanter worked to return antitrust back to the decades before the clarity of the consumer welfare standard. Under Khan, antitrust law became about protecting inefficient competitors, rectifying racial injustice, supporting labor unions, and vague notions of “fairness” over economic “efficiency”—in” short, anything the regulator wanted antitrust to do.

Which leads me to ask: Why are the 2023 Joint Merger guidelines promulgated by Biden’s Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and Justice Department Antitrust Chief Jonathan Kanter being continued in full by the new Republican, Trump-appointed FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson? A few weeks into office, Ferguson dispatched a memo saying, “Let me be clear: the FTC’s and DOJ’s joint 2023 Merger Guidelines are in effect and are the framework for this agency’s merger-review analysis.”

This supine acceptance of one of progressive antitrust’s greatest achievements by a free-market Republican administration has progressives enraptured, from remaining Biden commissioner Alvaro Bedoya to progressive doyen Matt Stoller. But how does Ferguson’s wholesale adoption of Biden’s guideline square with the economic vision of Donald Trump?

A few weeks into office, the president told the World Economic Forum, “My administration has also begun the largest deregulation campaign in history, far exceeding even the record-setting efforts of my last term.” Yet, thanks to Ferguson, antitrust is now wedded to Brown Shoe, the 1962 Supreme Court opinion that found a proposed merger to be illegal, despite the fact that the combined company would have controlled less than 5 percent of the American shoe market.

Judge Robert Bork wrote that Brown Shoe was predicated on the mistaken and ultimately disproven belief that Congress intended antitrust law to protect “small, locally owned businesses” over the interests of consumers. For this reason, courts had long treated Brown Shoe as a discarded piece in the museum of legal curiosities. Thanks first to Biden’s appointees, and now to Andrew Ferguson, Brown Shoe will be taken into consideration in advising courts how to apply the law.

But don’t look for the consumer welfare standard in the Ferguson-Biden merger guidelines. These principles, now enforced by the Trump Administration, don’t even deign to mention a standard that has been the central principle of antitrust jurisprudence for 46 years.

Without this standard and its reliance on econometrics, antitrust law is no longer a tool to promote efficiency and competition in the service of the consumer. It becomes a weapon the regulator can point in any direction he or she wants, at any politically disfavored target.

This ambiguity also kills the predictability businesses need to thrive. “Thanks to politicians, companies can be accused of improper behavior regardless of what they do,” economist Dan Mitchell wrote. “If they charge more than their competitors, they are guilty of monopolistic behavior. If they charge the same, then they are colluding with competitors. If they charge less, then they are using predatory pricing to drive out competition.”

So why, then, did Chairman Ferguson extend Biden-era rules that will continue to enhance the power of government over the free market? Former FTC Commissioner Christine Wilson famously declared that the goals of progressive antitrust are Marxist at their roots. The 2023 Merger Guidelines were central to that strategy. Why would any Trump appointee go along for that ride?

***


Robert H. Bork, Jr.
is president of the Antitrust Education Project.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/03/10/why-is-trumps-ftc-chairman-continuing-lina-khans-socialist-policies/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Most schools reopen for evacuated students in northern Israel - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

Sixty-four percent of the 16,000 pupils evacuated are now back in their original schools.

 

Israeli security and rescue forces at the site where a Hezbollah rocket fired from Lebanon hit homes and cars in the Haifa suburb of Kiryat Bialik, Sept. 22, 2024. Photo by Chaim Goldberg/Flash90.
Israeli security and rescue forces at the site where a Hezbollah rocket fired from Lebanon hit homes and cars in the Haifa suburb of Kiryat Bialik, Sept. 22, 2024. Photo by Chaim Goldberg/Flash90.

Nearly two-thirds of Israeli school children who were evacuated from their homes in the north due to the war with Hezbollah have returned to their schools, the Israeli Education Ministry said on Sunday.

Sixty-four percent of the 16,000 pupils evacuated last year are back in their original schools. The ministry said that 83% percent of evacuated teachers have also returned to teach in northern Israel.

Some 113 educational institutes in northern Israel have now reopened, including 57 kindergartens, 24 daycare centers, 22 elementary schools and 10 high schools.

A ceasefire with Hezbollah took effect in November after a yearlong war.

About 60,000 evacuated residents from northern Israel have still not returned home.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/most-schools-reopen-for-evacuated-students-in-northern-israel/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump administration launches new 'self-deportation' app - Reuters

 

by Reuters

Trump unveils new app to push undocumented migrants toward self-deportation amid immigration crackdown.

 

Colombians deported from the United States arrive at El Dorado International Airport in Bogota, Colombia, January 28, 2025.  (photo credit: REUTERS/LUISA GONZALEZ/FILE PHOTO)
Colombians deported from the United States arrive at El Dorado International Airport in Bogota, Colombia, January 28, 2025.
(photo credit: REUTERS/LUISA GONZALEZ/FILE PHOTO)

The Trump administration rolled out a new app on Monday that will allow immigrants in the United States illegally to "self deport" rather than face possible arrest and detention, building on President Donald Trump's deportation push.

The US Customs and Border Protection app, called CBP Home, will offer an option for someone to signal their "intent to depart," the agency said.

“The CBP Home app gives aliens the option to leave now and self-deport, so they may still have the opportunity to return legally in the future and live the American dream," Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. "If they don’t, we will find them, we will deport them, and they will never return.”

Trump, a Republican, has vowed to deport record numbers of migrants in the US illegally. Trump's initial deportation numbers lagged the monthly average in fiscal year 2024 under Democrat Joe Biden, although Biden's deportations included many recent border crossers.

The Trump administration has taken other steps that could pressure immigrants in the United States illegally to leave.

Mexican migrants deported from U.S. enter the temporary shelter at the Migrant Care Center, a temporary shelter, in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico March 6, 2025. (credit: JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ/REUTERS)Enlrage image
Mexican migrants deported from U.S. enter the temporary shelter at the Migrant Care Center, a temporary shelter, in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico March 6, 2025. (credit: JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ/REUTERS)

Register or get deported 

A Trump administration regulation set to take effect April 11 would require people lacking legal status to register with the federal government or face fines or jail time.

CBP Home replaces an app known as CBP One that was launched under Biden. The Biden-era app included a feature that allowed some one million migrants in Mexico to schedule an appointment to request entry at a legal border crossing.

Republicans criticized the Biden program, saying it facilitated mass migration to the United States and did not adequately vet migrants.

Trump shut down CBP One hours after taking office, leaving migrants with pending appointments stranded and unsure of next steps.


Reuters

Source: https://www.jpost.com/american-politics/article-845486

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter